Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/899
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJana, Arnab
dc.contributor.authorBasu, Rounaq
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Conan
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-26T05:54:58Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-26T05:54:58Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85067563118&doi=10.1016%2fj.seps.2019.06.002&partnerID=40&md5=414e03f4599b4eea2d0de9bb6ddef951
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/899-
dc.descriptionArnab Jana, Centre for Urban Science & Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India; Rounaq Basu, Department of Urban Studies & Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States; Conan Mukherjee, Economics Group, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkata, 700104, India
dc.descriptionISSN/ISBN - 00380121
dc.descriptionDOI - 10.1016/j.seps.2019.06.002
dc.description.abstractTo combat the critical stresses of rising urbanization, the government acquires land from private owners using the power of eminent domain. This land assembly causes negative externalities such as increasing social tension and injustice that may impose a long-term threat to stability and sustainable development. Therefore, there is a need to make the land acquisition process more transparent and just. Considering the unique Indian context where informality has a strong presence, we propose an approach based on game theory that models the bargain through a three-stage Nash equilibrium game. Four agents � the government, the private developer, the landowner, and the free rider � are considered. We provide conditional solutions for the generalizable Case and proceed to model different stakeholder behavior patterns through two utility functional forms � linear and exponential. In the linear case, we find that the free rider obtains half of the revenue of the project, whereas the landowner gains between one-fourth and one-half of the revenue. Thus, we highlight the undeniably crucial role free riders play in land acquisition negotiations. However, closed form solutions cannot be obtained for the exponential form, due to which we use simulations to demonstrate a solution procedure. We conclude by stating that the proposed model can be useful in formulating future land policies in a sustainable and inclusive manner, with optimal utility derivations for all concerned stakeholders. Our model can also be extended to other spatial contexts where informality features heavily in the land market, especially in the Global South.
dc.publisherSCOPUS
dc.publisherSocio-Economic Planning Sciences
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofseries69
dc.subjectEminent domain
dc.subjectGame theory
dc.subjectInformal land markets
dc.subjectLand acquisition
dc.subjectLand assembly
dc.subjectNash equilibrium
dc.titleA game theoretic approach to optimize multi-stakeholder utilities for land acquisition negotiations with informality
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Economics

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.