Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/829
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, Rajesh
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-26T05:48:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-26T05:48:07Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085420278&doi=10.1007%2f978-981-32-9468-4_9&partnerID=40&md5=577b12bf8e0845a2b4d375917670ed0f
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/829-
dc.descriptionBhattacharya, Rajesh, IIM, Calcutta, India
dc.descriptionpp.137-152
dc.descriptionDOI - 10.1007/978-981-32-9468-4_9
dc.description.abstractMarx’s concept of primitive accumulation has traditionally been understood as pre-history to the emergence and eventual universalization of capital in the social formation. I argue, to the contrary, that “primitive accumulation” can be a theoretical category only in the presence of a theorized notion of an “outside” to capital. This “outside” of capital in a social formation is populated by a “surpluspopulation”- another concept that needs to be delinked from the capitalocentric notion of “reserve army of labour”. Once we recognize an ever-present non-capitalist “outside” in a social formation, primitive accumulation becomes central to dominance of capital over a social formation.
dc.publisherSCOPUS
dc.publisher"Capital" in the East: Reflections on Marx
dc.publisherSpringer Singapore
dc.subjectAleatory
dc.subjectCapital
dc.subjectNon-capital
dc.subjectPrimitive accumulation
dc.subjectSurplus population
dc.titlePrimitive accumulation and surplus population: A critique of capitalocentrism in Marxian theory
dc.typeBook Chapter
Appears in Collections:Public Policy and Management

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.