Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/5242
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJammulamadaka, Nimruji Prasad
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Ashish
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-29T10:41:35Z
dc.date.available2025-03-29T10:41:35Z
dc.date.issued2024-12
dc.identifier.issn0971-6858(print version)
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/5242
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/09716858241303289
dc.descriptionNimruji Jammulamadaka, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkata 700104, West Bengal, India. E-mail: nimruji@iimcal.ac.in | Ashish Gupta, Jeevika Ashram, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Indiaen_US
dc.descriptionp. 85 - 96
dc.description.abstractLike knowledge systems of ancient civilizations everywhere, ancient Indian knowledge systems have been recognized for their emphasis on sustainable living practices. There is renewed interest in ‘going back to these roots’, a return to and a rediscovery of traditional knowledge and lifestyles, which we identify as neotraditionalism. Neotraditionalism has emerged in the encounter of the customary with the metropolitan colonial West and is influenced by Western Enlightenment’s liberal ethic of equality. It suffers from a blindness to diversity and difference. In this article, we argue that equality as universal feature of neotraditionalism makes it closer to Western consumer capitalism than it does to customary knowledge and practices. We suggest that modern western capitalism combined with Western Enlightenment’s liberal ethic of equality has eroded our appreciation for the link between difference, diversity and sustainability. Western capitalism is not only about changing modes of production but also about changing modes of consumption: the emergence of mass consumption practices with their emphasis on civic equality was a necessary step in the dismantling of aristocratic hierarchy. Restrictions in social structures hinder the emergence of bigger markets for capitalists and manufacturers. We therefore argue that the preoccupation of neotraditionalism with a universalization of tradition that is blind to jati-based differences and diversities undermines the implicit demand– supply balances that were historically at work within the framework of traditional sacred cultural beliefs and practices. Because of this, neotraditionalism errs on the side of promoting consumer capitalism and thereby eroding its ability to further the achievement of sustainability based on tradition. As such, neotraditionalism needs to delink from the liberal myth of equality and embrace diversity of consumption practices in order to truly enable sustainable lifestyles anchored in ancient Indian knowledge systems.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkataen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol.31;No.1
dc.subjectIndigenous knowledge systemen_US
dc.subjectNeotraditionalism
dc.subjectWestern consumer
dc.subjectCapitalism
dc.subjectDiversity
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.titleCustomary Indian Practices and Neotraditionalism: The Missing Link of Differenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Organizational Behavior

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Customary Indian Practices and Neotraditionalism- The Missing Link of Difference.pdf
  Until 2027-12-31
Customary Indian Practices and Neotraditionalism: The Missing Link of Difference721.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.