Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4959
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mukherjee, Deep N | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-17T10:04:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-17T10:04:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-09 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4959 | |
dc.description | Biosketch: Deep N Mukherjee is currently Chief Product Officer, handling product design and analytics in a Indian credit bureau. He has over 14 years of experience in Risk Management and Credit Assessment. Prior to his current role, within Fitch he was in structured finance team. Prior to his organization he was with American Express where he was heading the Institutional Risk Management Team focusing on quantitative risk management. He is also a visiting faculty in finance with IIM Calcutta. He has done his graduation in engineering from IIT, Kharagpur (BTech, 1999) and has obtained his management degree from IIM Lucknow (PGDM 2002). | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | SEBI redeemed itself on 4th August, 2017. This it did by issuing a circular which mandated listed companies to report ‘default’ in servicing bank loan, within 24 hours of the default. The circular which will become effective on 1st October 2017, a day before Gandhi Jayanti, would go a long way in enhancing the level, quality and urgency in disclosures to investors in Indian markets. As such, the markets have to make do with much inferior quality corporate disclosure than is the case is more developed markets. The circular unambiguously defines default as ‘non-payment of interest or principal amount in full on the pre-agreed date”. That the globally accepted definition of default would come from market regulator, and not the banking regulator, is a thought provoking matter in itself. This mandate from SEBI will go a long way in reducing the likelihood of another corporate credit blow-up, on the lines India is currently experiencing. However, this had come in 2011, it might have prevented at least INR 4 lakh crore shareholder value erosion which happened in the following six years. While SEBI may have redeemed itself the same cannot be said about the Board Members of NPA companies. The Board particularly the independent member, of over 500 listed and defaulted companies, have still to answer to their shareholders whether they have been doing their job at all or not. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | The Financial Research and Trading Laboratory (FRTL), IIM Calcutta | en_US |
dc.subject | SEBI | en_US |
dc.subject | NPA companies | |
dc.subject | Foreign currency convertible bonds (FCCB) | |
dc.subject | Key Management Personnel (KMP) | |
dc.subject | Investor | |
dc.subject | India | |
dc.subject | Indian markets | |
dc.title | How Board Members of Defaulted companies Oversaw Shareholder Value Erosion | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Issue 1, September 2017 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
How Board Members of Defaulted companies Oversaw.pdf | How Board Members of Defaulted companies Oversaw Shareholder Value Erosion | 2.87 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.