Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4958
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChandra, Ritesh
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-16T11:13:54Z
dc.date.available2024-10-16T11:13:54Z
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4958
dc.descriptionThe Financial Research and Trading Laboratory (FRTL), IIM Calcuttaen_US
dc.description.abstractUntil 2008, OTC derivatives focussed on market risk. Counterparty risk was considered secondary. Most counterparties had strong credit rating and the possibility of default was seen as remote. While Basel-II introduced a capital charge for counterparty risk in the trading book and accounting rules introduced in 2006 required counterparty risk to be factored into balance sheet valuations, it continued to be managed at PFE (Potential Future Exposure) level. Derivatives were valued using the concepts of risk neutral probabilities and no arbitrage. A risk neutral portfolio is expected to earn a risk-free rate and LIBOR rates were the benchmark. The “risk-neutral” or “risk free” price assumed a credit risk free world – where none of the counterparties would default and all contractual cash flows will happenen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Financial Research and Trading Laboratory (FRTL), IIM Calcuttaen_US
dc.subjectCredit Valueen_US
dc.subjectFinancial crisis
dc.subjectCredit Value Adjustment (CVA)
dc.subjectData challenges
dc.subjectCDS market
dc.titleCredit Value Adjustment - Explaineden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Issue 1, September 2017

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Credit Value Adjustment - Explained.pdfCredit Value Adjustment - Explained2.86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.