Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4919
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPurkayastha, Dhruba
dc.contributor.authorSarkar, Runa
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-12T14:56:21Z
dc.date.available2024-09-12T14:56:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2374-1325(Online)
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4919
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2021.1.122
dc.descriptionDhruba Purkayastha, US-India Clean Energy Finance (USICEF) Facility at the Climate Policy Initiative in New Delhi, India. | Runa Sarkar, Economics Group at the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta in Kolkata, India.en_US
dc.descriptionPages: 27-41
dc.description.abstractFinancing the Paris Agreement commitments would require trillions of dollars per year, and most of that would need to come from private sources. Despite huge potential, climate finance flows remain constrained by many barriers, key among them the lack of financial viability of climate-focused projects. Despite several initiatives and innovative financing solutions to incentivize private finance—such as blended finance to leverage public finance and risk mitigation solutions to enable commercial climate investments—private investments in green projects are limited. To a large extent, the regulated financial system of banking and capital markets and the extant regulations do not align well with the goals of climate finance. A major shift is required in the existing trajectory of the current targets for climate-focused investments to be met, both by lending institutions and capital markets. One approach to addressing the concern about adequate finance for green projects focuses on factoring climate risks into investment and lending decisions (that is, into pricing and capital allocation) through banking regulation. These alternatives are discussed in this article. Another concern, the risk associated with the greening financial markets themselves, could be countered by offering a risk subsidy for banks and financial institutions that finance climate investments; this strategy would include subsidizing the cost of financing green projects through a reduction in the risk premium or capital charges of the project. Risks could be priced by using the mechanism of trading and pricing carbon emissions, and resources from a carbon tax also could be allocated to pay for the subsidy. This article discusses a structure to make a blended finance option effective. Both of these approaches—enabling regulations and blended finance to lower the cost of capital—can unlock substantial financing opportunities for climate projects. Institutional commitment is paramount to facilitate both the financing of green projects and the greening of the financial sector.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Journal of Structured Financeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 27;Issue 2 (Summer)
dc.subjectESG investingen_US
dc.subjectRisk management
dc.subjectLegal/regulatory/public policy
dc.subjectReal assets/alternative investments/private equity
dc.titleGetting Financial Markets to Work for Climate Financeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Economics

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.