Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4838
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Seetharaman, Priya | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-04T11:26:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-04T11:26:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0304-0941(print version) | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4838 | |
dc.description | P. Seetharaman, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkata, India | en_US |
dc.description | p. 269-270 | |
dc.description.abstract | A key aspect of any academic discipline is its ability to engage in intellectual debates which are both respectful and based on evidence. The purpose of such debates is primarily to advance our understanding and practice while acknowledging that there is value to be gained from questioning our ingrained cognitive assumptions. Although the idea of intellectual debates can be traced back to ancient civilization, much of the early debates centered around religious sects and beliefs held by different groups of people. Tibetan Buddhism, for example, continues the rich debate culture, roots of which go back as far as seventh century Samye Debate which is said to have focused on the deep question of whether enlightenment is attained gradually through activity or in an instant without activity. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkata | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vol. 50;No. 3 | |
dc.title | Editorial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Issue 3, September 2023 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Editorial.pdf Until 2027-12-31 | Editorial | 367.14 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.