Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/476
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJindal, Varun
dc.contributor.authorJaiswall, Manju
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-13T10:26:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-26T03:59:36Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-13T10:26:49Z
dc.date.available2021-08-26T03:59:36Z-
dc.date.issued2015-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/476-
dc.description.abstractWith the new Companies Act 2013 as well as Clause 49 of the listing agreement with stock exchanges in India mandating gender quota in the form of inclusion of at least one woman director in the board composition, the study on board diversity has assumed significant importance in the Indian context. Instead of limiting ourselves to gender diversity, we examine the various facets of diversity among the board of directors for a cross-sectional sample of listed firms in India and their association with the accounting and stock-based measures of firm performance as proxied by return on assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q respectively. We also explore if this relation is influenced by the ownership concentration in firms. We use three measures viz. Blau Index, Shannon Index and Coefficient of Variation for defining our diversity attributes based on gender, age, nationality, educational qualification, tenure and independence. Unlike several other research studies, we do not pool the various diversity scores to create a single diversity index as it has the potential to mask the actual association of each diversity attribute. We find that Tobin's Q is positively associated with international diversity suggesting that firms with higher proportion of international directors are considered favourably by investors than the ones with lower proportion. Moreover, firms where directors have repeat appointments increasing their tenure with the firms are valued less favourably by their investors. We also find that ROA is negatively associated with statutory diversity (board independence) which could possibly be attributed to over-monitoring in already well-governed firms. However, in our sample, we do not find significant difference in the association of board diversity with firm performance, contingent upon the ownership concentration or firm type (i.e. whether a firm is family firm or not based on our chosen definitions of a family firm).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherINDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT CALCUTTAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWORKING PAPER SERIES;WPS No. 765 July 2015
dc.subjectBoard diversityen_US
dc.subjectcorporate governanceen_US
dc.subjectfirm performanceen_US
dc.titleBoard Diversity and Firm Performance Influenced by Ownership Concentration: Evidence from Indiaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:2015

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
wps_765.pdf597.86 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.