Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4720Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Unni, V.K. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Financial Express | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-07T04:47:01Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-07T04:47:01Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-04-23 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/supreme-courts-mistry-tata-judgment-the-case-for-a-review/2315456/ | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4720 | - |
| dc.description | Source: News: Online: Financial Express Dated: 23-08-2021 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd, part of the Shapoorji Pallonji Group, has filed a review petition before the Supreme Court (SC) regarding its March 26, 2021, judgement (hereon, SC Judgement). In the said judgement, the SC had held in favour of the controlling shareholders of Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd, by setting aside the decision of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), pronounced in December 2019. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Financial Express | en_US |
| dc.subject | Supreme Court | en_US |
| dc.subject | National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | en_US |
| dc.subject | CA 2013 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Section 166 | en_US |
| dc.title | Supreme Court’s Mistry-Tata Judgment: The case for a review | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | IIMC Stakeholders | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ppm-15.pdf | Supreme Court’s Mistry-Tata Judgment: The case for a review | 521.33 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.