Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4542
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBollapragada, Ramesh
dc.contributor.authorRao, Uday S.
dc.contributor.authorWu, Junying
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-09T11:02:13Z
dc.date.available2023-07-09T11:02:13Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.identifier.issn0304-0941(print version)
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/4542
dc.descriptionR. Bollapragada, Decision Sciences Department, College of Business, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA | U. S. Rao, OBAIS Department, Lindner College of Business, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA | J. Wu, Credit Risk Analytics Consultant, Wells Fargo, Walnut Creek, CA 94597, USAen_US
dc.descriptionp. 115-128
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies a telecommunications hub location model that includes the classical capac- itated facility location problem on a wireline network, as well as a wireless network with technological constraints on crane-rain radius, line-of-sight, and capacity. There are multiple wireline and wireless hub types, differing in costs and capacities. We present a mathematical model to maximize network profit, build and test a quick greedy heuristic, and conduct sensitivity analysis using representative data. Solu- tions from the greedy heuristic are compared to the optimal solution for small instances, and the results indicate that the profit is on an average, within 98% of the optimal. For large instances that are intractable for the exact optimization approach, profit from the greedy solution is, on average, within 92% of that obtained from an upper-bounding linear programming relaxation. Sensitivity analysis shows that the optimal demand captured, revenue, and costs are not always monotone in input parameters: For a range of input values, profits improve by capturing more revenue with higher costs being incurred, in other cases, profits improve by reducing the costs of capturing demand while maintaining, or sometimes reducing revenue. Reducing hub installation costs or link transmission costs typically improves profit more than increasing hub capacity or link capacity by the same percentage. The combined network with both wireline and wire- less technologies always delivers the highest profit, but in certain cases, depending on the demand, link capacity, and hub installation costs, either wireline- only or wireless-only networks can be quite competitive.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkataen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 50;No. 1
dc.subjectHub locationen_US
dc.subjectWirelineen_US
dc.subjectFixed- wirelessen_US
dc.subjectOptimizationen_US
dc.subjectGreedy heuristicen_US
dc.titleHub location–allocation for combined fixed-wireless and wireline broadband access networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Issue 1, March 2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hub location.pdf
  Until 2027-12-31
Hub location737.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.