Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/453
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnshuman, V. Ravi
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Nivedita
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-28T10:35:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-26T03:58:52Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-28T10:35:29Z
dc.date.available2021-08-26T03:58:52Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/453-
dc.description.abstractUnlike conglomerates in the U.S., where investment ows may be distorted due to power struggles (Rajan, Servaes, and Zingales (2000)), we nd that diversi ed business groups in India, on average, invest e ciently. Our analysis controls for the possibility of tunneling (Bertrand, Mehta, and Mullainathan (2002)). Overall, our results suggest that investment decisions in diversi ed business groups are consistent with the E cient Internal Capital Markets Hypothesis. We also nd that the presence of relational contracts in business groups mitigates the adverse e ects of tunneling incentives, consistent with the internal governance argument in Acharya, Myers, and Rajan (2011).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherINDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT CALCUTTAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWORKING PAPER SERIES;WPS No. 751 August 2014
dc.titlePower Struggles, Tunneling Incentives, and Investment Efficiency in Diversified Business Groupsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:2014

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
wps_751.pdf370.21 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.