Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/3967
Title: Herding and Financial Markets: The case of REDDIT daytraders versus Hedge funds
Authors: Ashta, Arvind
Keywords: Small investors
REDDIT
Liquidity
Wall Street movement
Stock Exchange
Issue Date: Mar-2021
Publisher: The Financial Research and Trading Laboratory (FRTL), IIM Calcutta
Abstract: The whole world was shocked. On January 28, 2021, the Financial Times reported that a group of small investors beat the hedge funds (Wigglesworth, 2021). These investors made 300% returns in one day, and about 1500% in 2 weeks, while the hedge fund Melvin Capital lost more than $4.5 billion in January (Schroeder, 2021). The question is, what happened? It may be good to provide a small introduction for a non-financial audience as a background to the case. As you know, the stock market trades in shares that represent ownership in a company. After obtaining shares from a company, investors buy and sell these shares in the secondary market. They pay a commission to the broker who gets the shares for them. Supply and demand establish the price as shown in the top panel of Figure 1. If demand increases, the price goes up; if supply increases, the price goes down; and there is some equilibrium price. As seen in the bottom panel of figure 1, investors can make profits by buying low and later selling high, hoping that price will go up from P0 to P1 in the figure. But one could also sell high and later buy low. Hedge funds backed by high net worth investors do this, hoping the price would go down from P0 to P2. One problem with the system is that the commission per share charged to big investors is much smaller. If a broker is given a deal of €1 million, he could ask for a commission of €1000, which is 0.1%. But if a small investor wants to make a deal of €1000, the broker may ask for at least €10, which is 1%. The point is that the commission percentage is higher for small investors, and the game is biased in favor of the rich. To compete effectively, small investors get together in mutual funds. Once their collective trades are larger, they get the advantage of smaller fees, but they have to pay fund management fees. Besides reducing the commission costs, investors in mutual funds also have lower risk since they can diversify into many stocks.
Description: Biosketch: Dr. Arvind Ashta is an alumnus of IIM Calcutta (1980-82). He is now professor of Finance at the Burgundy School of Business, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté in Dijon, France, and is member of its research center CEREN, EA 7477. His main research area is micro-finance, but he sometimes writes on macro issues. He has over sixty publications in international journals. His most recent book is “A Realistic Theory of Social Entrepreneurship: A Life Cycle Analysis of Micro-Finance” (Palgrave MacMillan, 2020). He is a member of a club of micro-investors.
URI: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/3967
Appears in Collections:Issue 4, March 2021

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Herding and Financial Markets.pdfHerding and Financial Markets: The case of REDDIT daytraders versus Hedge funds22.3 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.