Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/3273
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRai, Rajnish
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-27T09:02:35Z
dc.date.available2021-08-27T09:02:35Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.issn0304-0941 (print version) ; 2197-1722 (electronic version)
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-019-00214-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/3273
dc.descriptionRajnish Rai, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, India
dc.descriptionp.111-126
dc.descriptionIssue Editor – Devi Vijay
dc.description.abstractIn this study, I examine how dissenting subjects become precarious in the context of national security labor. I argue that the intersection of neoliberal and cultural nationalist practices produces a state formation, which is not genuinely interested in building institutional capacities for strengthening national security. Instead, the neoliberal, cultural nationalist state is more interested in investing in organizational actors who can produce spectacles, which transform citizens into passive consumers of state propaganda. Dissenters who call for expansion of institutional capacities threaten the prevailing authority structures, as institutions can then become sites for democratic action. Using auto-ethnographic approach to analyze the letters that I wrote while working in a national security organization in India and its subsequent coverage in the media, I contend that the marginalization of the dissenter is used as a tactic by the state for normalizing the erosion of institutional capacities.
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkata
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol.46;No.2 (Special Issue on Changing Nature of Work and Organizations in India)
dc.subjectDissent
dc.subjectAuto-ethnography
dc.subjectNational security labor
dc.subjectHindu nationalism
dc.subjectNeoliberal India
dc.subjectPrecariousness
dc.subjectIndian Police Service
dc.titleThe production of precariousness for the dissenting subject at the intersections of neoliberal and cultural nationalist practice
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Issue 2, June 2019

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
The production of precariousness for the dissenting subject.pdf
  Until 2027-03-31
249.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.