Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/3247
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Suman
dc.contributor.authorGoyal, Vinay
dc.contributor.authorKalakbandi, Vinay Kumar
dc.contributor.authorBasu, Sankarshan
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-27T08:56:38Z
dc.date.available2021-08-27T08:56:38Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.issn0304-0941 (print version) ; 2197-1722 (electronic version)
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-018-0185-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/3247
dc.descriptionSuman Gupta & Vinay Goyal, Indian Institute of Management Raipur, GEC Campus, IIM Building, Sejbahar, Raipur, 492015, Chhattisgarh, India; Vinay Kumar Kalakbandi, Institute of Management Technology Hyderabad, Cherlaguda Village, RR District Survey No. 38, Shamshabad Mandal, Hyderabad, 501218, India; Sankarshan Basu, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, Bannerghatta Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560076, India
dc.descriptionp.235-257
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we present evidence in favour of the overconfidence bias and its persistence in pre-, during and post-global recession sub-samples in China and India. The Chinese and Indian investors follow past market returns for the longer duration and trade excessively, which is posited as overconfidence bias. The global recession is facilitated as a structural break to examine the endurance of the overconfident trading activities. The Chinese investors are found to be more overconfident than the Indian investors in each sub-sample. We also explore that the Chinese and Indian investors are more overconfident in up than in down market states and overconfident trading behaviour of the Chinese investors is more than that of the Indian investors in both market states. The endogenous structure of vector autoregression also considers liquidity as one of the drivers of overconfident trading behaviour. Besides trading volume, market liquidity also follows market returns for a short duration, but not vice versa. The lead–lag relationship of volume–volatility and liquidity–volatility is also explored by considering volatility as the exogenous variable.
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkata
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol.45;No.3
dc.subjectOverconfidence
dc.subjectLiquidity
dc.subjectGlobal Recession
dc.subjectVector autoregression
dc.subjectEmerging markets
dc.titleOverconfidence, trading volume and liquidity effect in Asia’s Giants: evidence from pre-, during- and post-global recession
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Issue 3, September 2018

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Overconfidence, trading volume and liquidity effect.pdf
  Until 2027-03-31
1.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.