Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/1848
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChakrabarti, Binay Bhushan
dc.contributor.authorMohanty, Mritiunjoy
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-26T07:05:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-26T07:05:30Z-
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84859330507&partnerID=40&md5=b9c10426afc9151d29006be2b9b3cafa
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/1848-
dc.descriptionChakrabarti, Binay Bhushan, IIM, Calcutta, India; Mohanty, Mritiunjoy, IIM, Calcutta, India
dc.descriptionISSN/ISBN - 129976
dc.descriptionpp.72-75
dc.description.abstractContrary to Rajesh Chakrabarti's assessment of the Jalan Committee Report on the key issue of systemic stability (epw, 8 January 2011), this comment critiques some of the report's recommendations by discussing the jcr on the types of regulatory and market structures, and the nature of competition.
dc.publisherSCOPUS
dc.publisherEconomic and Political Weekly
dc.relation.ispartofseries46(11)
dc.titleRisk, regulation and competition: A different view on the Jalan Committee Report
dc.typeReview
Appears in Collections:Economics

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.