Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/1353
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKuiti, Mithu Rani
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Debabrata
dc.contributor.authorBasu, Preetam
dc.contributor.authorBisi, Arnab
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-26T06:05:27Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-26T06:05:27Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075427610&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijpe.2019.107537&partnerID=40&md5=2abc0efe162b3326e6e81dc16e1695e3
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/1353-
dc.descriptionMithu Rani Kuiti, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, NH 65, Nagaur Road, Karwar, Rajasthan 342037, India; Debabrata Ghosh, Operations and Supply Chain Management Area, MIT Global Scale Network, Malaysia Institute for Supply Chain Innovation, Malaysia; Preetam Basu, Operations Management Group, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Diamond Harbour Road, Joka, Kolkata, 700104, India; Arnab Bisi, Operations Management and Business Analytics Area, Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, 100 International Drive, Baltimore, MD 21202-1099, United States
dc.descriptionISSN/ISBN - 09255273
dc.descriptionDOI - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107537
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies a manufacturer-retailer channel selling complementary green products under the cap-and-trade policy and analyzes strategic decisions in these settings. While the manufacturer faces government mandated cap-and-trade norm, the retailer invests in corporate social responsibility through selling of green products. In this study, we conduct a comparative analysis of the players� decisions under centralized and decentralized scenarios and explore the role of cap-and-trade policy in influencing decision outcomes. Further, three contracts are proposed to improve channel performance, namely, the two-part tariff, corporate social responsibility (CSR) effort sharing, and green cost sharing contracts. The results show that collaboration among the supply chain players through contracts supports green initiatives vis-�-vis the decentralized channel. However, given a choice of contracts, the channel prefers those contracts from which the manufacturer accrues direct benefits because he incurs greening costs. The results further demonstrate that carbon markets play an important role in influencing green initiatives, particularly, under high trading prices, where manufacturers are incentivized to improve their product offerings. Further, the cap-and-trade policy influences retailers to work toward building higher reputation and brand value through investments in higher CSR effort. From a retail price perspective, we find that consumers benefit under higher trading prices because the benefits of carbon surplus and higher revenues of the supply chain players result in lowering the prices for consumers. However, it is in contrast to studies on the decentralized channel outcomes or environmental taxation because in both the scenarios, greening or CSR costs get transferred to the consumers in the form of higher prices.
dc.publisherSCOPUS
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Production Economics
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofseries223
dc.subjectCap-and-trade policy
dc.subjectCorporate social responsibility
dc.subjectGreen supply chain
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.titleDo cap-and-trade policies drive environmental and social goals in supply chains: Strategic decisions, collaboration, and contract choices
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Operations Management

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.