Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/1040
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJha, Ashish Kumar
dc.contributor.authorBose, Indranil
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-26T06:03:22Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-26T06:03:22Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073747837&doi=10.17705%2f1CAIS.04514&partnerID=40&md5=5d638a3b31109d2fe56bb56a6f2b001f
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.iimcal.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/1040-
dc.descriptionJha, Ashish Kumar, Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, Rennes School of Business, France; Bose, Indranil, Management Information Systems, The IIMC Case Research Centre, Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, India
dc.descriptionISSN/ISBN - 15293181
dc.descriptionpp.207-225
dc.descriptionDOI - 10.17705/1CAIS.04514
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we examine the impact that headquarter interventions have on how subsidiaries evolve in the Indian IT offshoring industry. We analyze how a subsidiary evolved in the presence of a rare phenomenon: a negative headquarter intervention. Such an evolution has nuances and theoretical implications that existing frameworks cannot fully explain. Although researchers have often studied the relationship between a subsidiary and its headquarters through a headquarter-intervention lens, they have not employed it to examine how subsidiaries evolve. In this paper, we present a generalized model of subsidiary evolution using three constructs: value potential, headquarter intervention, and headquarter control of the subsidiary. In line with our study�s exploratory nature, we conducted an in-depth case study of a multinational firm and its Indian subsidiary over several years. We found that, in the presence of high potential value in the subsidiary ecosystem, certain headquarter interventions can lead to a conflict between the headquarters and the subsidiary. If not aligned with the subsidiary�s interests and values, a headquarter intervention can negatively affect the subsidiary�s growth even if the headquarters has good intentions. � 2019 by the Association for Information Systems.
dc.publisherSCOPUS
dc.publisherCommunications of the Association for Information Systems
dc.publisherAssociation for Information Systems
dc.relation.ispartofseries45(1)
dc.subjectCase study
dc.subjectHeadquarter intervention
dc.subjectIt offshoring
dc.subjectIT services industry
dc.subjectSubsidiary evolution
dc.titleConflict and development: A headquarter intervention view of IT subsidiary evolution
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Management Information Systems

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.